1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-55.26%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 29.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.59%
Cost reduction while SEDG shows 21.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-139.07%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 65.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-187.33%
Margin decline while SEDG shows 73.37% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.64%
Similar G&A growth to SEDG's 26.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-50.23%
Marketing expense reduction while SEDG shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.47%
Operating expenses reduction while SEDG shows 4.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.46%
Total costs reduction while SEDG shows 14.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.87%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.84%
D&A reduction while SEDG shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-98.23%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 11.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-343.07%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 32.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.85%
Operating income decline while SEDG shows 4.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.28%
Operating margin decline while SEDG shows 26.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.54%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 199.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.75%
Pre-tax income decline while SEDG shows 21.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-223.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 39.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SEDG's 48.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-65.77%
Net income decline while SEDG shows 16.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-270.51%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 35.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
149.04%
Share count increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
149.04%
Diluted share increase while SEDG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.