PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Revenue decline while SEDG shows 28.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.73%
Gross profit decline while SEDG shows 115.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.25%
Margin expansion below 50% of SEDG's 112.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-9.11%
Marketing expense reduction while SEDG shows 3.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.24%
Interest expense reduction while SEDG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.28%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-69.67%
EBITDA decline while SEDG shows 73.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.49%
EBITDA margin decline while SEDG shows 79.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
104.85%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 61.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
105.19%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 69.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-89.65%
Other expenses reduction while SEDG shows 183.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.70%
Pre-tax income decline while SEDG shows 66.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while SEDG shows 73.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while SEDG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-82.70%
Net income decline while SEDG shows 65.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.46%
Net margin decline while SEDG shows 73.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.87%
EPS decline while SEDG shows 66.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.76%
Diluted EPS decline while SEDG shows 66.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of SEDG's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
115.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SEDG's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.