PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.26%
Revenue decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-9.58%
Cost reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
22.85%
Growth of 22.85% versus flat Solar gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
28.33%
Margin change of 28.33% versus flat Solar margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-149.74%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
Operating expenses change of 13.80% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-6.33%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
D&A change of 28.15% versus flat Solar D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
40.41%
EBITDA change of 40.41% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.66%
EBITDA margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
64.97%
Income change of 64.97% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
72.32%
Margin change of 72.32% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-226.15%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
79.73%
Tax expense change of 79.73% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-42.17%
Net income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-39.59%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.00%
EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-42.80%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.93%
Share count reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.