PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.00%
Revenue growth near Solar median of 23.50%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry-standard growth is attractive.
24.40%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.05%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.01%
Growth of 13.01% versus flat Solar gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-7.37%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
339.16%
R&D change of 339.16% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.03%
Operating expenses change of 7.03% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
21.52%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.85%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-32.00%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-17.16%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 33.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
18.67%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.73%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 11.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
32.20%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
8.36%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
59.22%
Other expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
79.55%
Pre-tax income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
47.17%
Margin change of 47.17% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-28.06%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
146.08%
Net income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
101.71%
Net margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
162.24%
EPS change of 162.24% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
144.76%
Diluted EPS change of 144.76% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.37%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
3.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Solar median of 4.66%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.