PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.67%
Revenue growth near Solar median of 58.75%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry-standard growth is attractive.
57.81%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.88%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.16%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.82%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.33%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
20.39%
R&D growth 50-90% of Solar median of 29.73%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine spending discipline.
6.07%
G&A change of 6.07% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Other expenses change of 3.15% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
10.08%
Operating expenses growth 50-90% of Solar median of 13.21%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
40.01%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 27.90%. Guy Spier would scrutinize spending.
2.35%
Interest expense growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
3.62%
D&A growth below 50% of Solar median of 10.94%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
634.58%
EBITDA change of 634.58% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
368.88%
EBITDA margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
482.57%
Income change of 482.57% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
344.19%
Operating margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-93.32%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 10.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
46.82%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.16%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-6.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -3.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
272.18%
Tax expense growth while Solar reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
36.18%
Income change of 36.18% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-13.08%
Net margin decline while Solar median is -5.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.15%
EPS decline while Solar median is 4.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-50.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 4.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.54%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-2.13%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.