PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.21%
Growth of 17.21% versus flat Solar revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
216.39%
Cost growth of 216.39% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-72.55%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-76.58%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
3.94%
R&D change of 3.94% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
24.83%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.23%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
21.98%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.35%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
1.40%
Interest expense change of 1.40% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
11.35%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 9.69%. John Neff would investigate asset efficiency.
-34.98%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -0.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-44.52%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is -0.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-42.37%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -0.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-50.83%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -0.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-601.58%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.98%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.75%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-95.09%
Net income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-95.81%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-114.57%
EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-115.69%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.25%
Share count change of 0.25% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.