PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.83%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -7.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-48.11%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -1.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-62.76%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -12.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-22.70%
Margin decline while Solar median is -0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.19%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-67.25%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
128.20%
Other expenses change of 128.20% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-12.25%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-43.53%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
48.75%
Interest expense growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.54%. Jim Chanos would check leverage.
-11.34%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 3.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-88.81%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -16.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.77%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is -6.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-100.96%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -20.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-102.00%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -9.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-205.48%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -69.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-115.88%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -28.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-132.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -18.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-507.42%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is -1.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-101.39%
Net income decline while Solar median is -27.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-102.89%
Net margin decline while Solar median is -18.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.54%
EPS decline while Solar median is -27.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.54%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is -27.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.83%
Share count change of 0.83% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-8.75%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.