PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.59%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
16.38%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.94%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
62.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 14.01%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
34.70%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.68%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-18.00%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 2.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.58%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is 2.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
18.67%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.24%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
3.74%
Interest expense growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.14%. Jim Chanos would check leverage.
0.42%
D&A growth below 50% of Solar median of 13.38%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-21.27%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.56%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 13.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.07%
Income change of 0.07% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
17.14%
Margin change of 17.14% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-26.00%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -18.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.05%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -5.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
11.24%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
681.19%
Tax expense change of 681.19% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-12.95%
Net income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.34%
Margin change of 6.34% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-5.97%
EPS decline while Solar median is 1.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.97%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 1.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5.99%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.05%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
5.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.05%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.