PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.90%
Growth of 8.90% versus flat Solar revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
8.76%
Cost growth of 8.76% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
9.90%
Growth of 9.90% versus flat Solar gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.91%
Margin change of 0.91% versus flat Solar margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
6.04%
R&D change of 6.04% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
11.58%
G&A change of 11.58% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.56%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.39%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
11.81%
Total costs change of 11.81% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
33.16%
Interest expense change of 33.16% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-15.57%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
118.55%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
117.03%
Margin change of 117.03% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-46.05%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -9.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.11%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -3.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
206.33%
Other expenses change of 206.33% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify control.
35.01%
Pre-tax income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
40.32%
Pre-tax margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-94.40%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is -1.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
42.34%
Net income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
47.05%
Net margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
42.25%
EPS change of 42.25% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
42.25%
Diluted EPS change of 42.25% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.39%
Share count change of 0.39% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.