PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
9.40%
Cost growth of 9.40% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-32.38%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-30.37%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
13.88%
R&D change of 13.88% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
20.40%
G&A change of 20.40% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.48%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.61%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
10.93%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.89%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-3.07%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.22%
D&A growth below 50% of Solar median of 3.18%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-53.56%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-52.18%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-67.05%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -1.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.07%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
19.68%
Other expenses change of 19.68% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-86.15%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-85.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
296.39%
Tax expense change of 296.39% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-79.39%
Net income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-78.78%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-79.78%
EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-79.45%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate strategy.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.