PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-67.89%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -4.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-59.32%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -0.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-214.64%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -0.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-879.86%
Margin decline while Solar median is -5.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-14.02%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
1.33%
G&A growth while Solar reduces overhead. Peter Lynch would examine operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is -12.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-52.59%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -4.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
15.54%
Interest expense change of 15.54% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-19.70%
D&A reduction while Solar median is -10.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
26.44%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-129.10%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is -1.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
51.95%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-49.64%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -19.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
21.51%
Other expenses growth below 50% of Solar median of 64.82%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
51.02%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-52.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 14.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
121.25%
Tax expense growth while Solar reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
51.12%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 26.95%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-52.23%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 38.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
51.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.02%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.