PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.77%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -19.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-16.99%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -2.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-392.47%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -2.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-546.07%
Margin decline while Solar median is 4.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.72%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
16.75%
G&A change of 16.75% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Operating expenses change of 12.31% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-23.78%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -10.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-44.43%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.54%
D&A growth below 50% of Solar median of 3.23%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-72.14%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is 10.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-125.84%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 8.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-116.79%
Operating income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-184.41%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
113.65%
Other expenses growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
44.12%
Income change of 44.12% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
26.70%
Margin change of 26.70% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
169.18%
Tax expense growth while Solar reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
43.28%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.24%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
25.58%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.94%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
43.75%
EPS change of 43.75% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
43.75%
Diluted EPS change of 43.75% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.41%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.25%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.41%
Diluted share change of 0.41% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.