PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of Solar median of 18.84%. Jim Chanos would check for market share loss risks.
6.05%
Cost growth below 50% of Solar median of 12.86%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive cost advantages.
-0.76%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 5.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-5.07%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-18.04%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.13%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is 44.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.40%
Total costs growth below 50% of Solar median of 18.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
70.85%
Interest expense change of 70.85% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
41.05%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.01%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-86.01%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -1.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-86.62%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
76.66%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
68.99%
Margin change of 68.99% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-108.59%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -17.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-96.25%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -13.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-96.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -2.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-191.86%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-94.39%
Net income decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-94.63%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-94.87%
EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.06%
Share count change of 0.06% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-8.82%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.