1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.35%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -6.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.05%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -6.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-38.74%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 14.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-30.89%
Margin decline while Solar median is 13.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
30.34%
R&D change of 30.34% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
18.65%
Operating expenses growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-2.76%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -10.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.47%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is -3.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
8.05%
D&A change of 8.05% versus flat Solar D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-259.08%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is 29.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-279.44%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 7.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-279.01%
Operating income decline while Solar median is 7.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-301.93%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is 6.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-37.28%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -5.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-954.79%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is 14.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1064.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 13.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
142.96%
Tax expense change of 142.96% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-817.67%
Net income decline while Solar median is 7.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-909.53%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 5.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-825.00%
EPS decline while Solar median is 2.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-825.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is 2.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.17%
Share count change of 0.17% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.56%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.