PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.05%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -4.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-95.29%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -11.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-91.56%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is 3.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-90.93%
Margin decline while Solar median is 0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-16.93%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.89%
Operating expenses growth while Solar reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-6.05%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -11.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
32.39%
Interest expense change of 32.39% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-98.31%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 3.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-408.04%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -11.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-446.58%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 0.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
52.17%
Operating income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
48.54%
Margin change of 48.54% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-671.98%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -25.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-79.94%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -25.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -1.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-160.35%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 3.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-19.73%
Net income decline while Solar median is -28.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.81%
Net margin decline while Solar median is -1.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5.26%
EPS growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2636.84%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is -21.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.11%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.07%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.11%
Diluted share change of 0.11% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.