PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.13%
Revenue decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
1784.74%
Cost growth of 1784.74% versus flat Solar costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-56.88%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -19.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-47.96%
Margin decline while Solar median is -10.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.23%
R&D reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
1401.26%
G&A change of 1401.26% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-12.39%
Marketing expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.11%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.82%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-0.27%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is 1.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-32.60%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6953.88%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.90%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
64.53%
EBITDA growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
57.20%
EBITDA margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-44.93%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -9.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-74.89%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -9.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
83.17%
Other expenses change of 83.17% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify control.
55.33%
Pre-tax income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
46.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
86.13%
Tax expense growth while Solar reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
26.00%
Net income growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
10.70%
Net margin growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-294.44%
EPS decline while Solar median is -36.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
86.35%
Diluted EPS growth while Solar declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while Solar median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.06%
Diluted share change of 0.06% versus stable Solar. Walter Schloss would verify approach.