PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.24%
Positive growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
61.46%
Cost increase while Solar shows cost reduction. Peter Lynch would examine competitive disadvantages.
-253.92%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -2.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-187.18%
Margin decline while Solar median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.39%
G&A change of 195.39% versus flat Solar overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
254.97%
Marketing expense change of 254.97% versus flat Solar spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.42%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
153.87%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.53%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
0.60%
Interest expense growth near Solar median of 0.60%. Charlie Munger would verify industry norms.
-7.29%
D&A reduction while Solar median is 1.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-571.02%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -64.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-444.47%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is -39.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-215.67%
Operating income decline while Solar median is -27.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-156.14%
Operating margin decline while Solar median is -10.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-994.87%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is -55.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-461.78%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -57.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-355.84%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is -59.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-390.49%
Net income decline while Solar median is -121.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-297.99%
Net margin decline while Solar median is -179.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-296.15%
EPS decline while Solar median is -121.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-296.15%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is -121.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-38.35%
Share count reduction while Solar median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.