PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.69%
Revenue decline while Solar median is -6.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-10.14%
Cost reduction while Solar median is -34.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.73%
Gross profit decline while Solar median is -15.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
4.25%
Margin expansion below 50% of Solar median of 8.76%. Jim Chanos would check for pricing pressure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.46%
G&A reduction while Solar median is -3.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-9.11%
Marketing expense reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
Operating expenses reduction while Solar median is -5.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-25.85%
Total costs reduction while Solar median is -25.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.24%
Interest expense reduction while Solar median is -9.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-9.28%
D&A reduction while Solar median is -23.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-69.67%
EBITDA decline while Solar median is -25.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-67.49%
EBITDA margin decline while Solar median is 8.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
104.85%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
105.19%
Margin change of 105.19% versus flat Solar. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-89.65%
Other expenses reduction while Solar median is 17.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-82.70%
Pre-tax income decline while Solar median is -15.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-81.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while Solar reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-82.70%
Net income decline while Solar median is -15.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-81.46%
Net margin decline while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-83.87%
EPS decline while Solar median is -46.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-99.76%
Diluted EPS decline while Solar median is -44.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.21%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
115.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Solar median of 0.37%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.