1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.22%
Positive growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-147.33%
Cost reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
401.45%
Growth of 401.45% versus flat Energy gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
372.11%
Margin change of 372.11% versus flat Energy margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-126.33%
R&D reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.53%
Operating expenses change of 8.53% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.63%
Total costs change of 6.63% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
30.42%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
15.34%
EBITDA change of 15.34% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
8.59%
Margin change of 8.59% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.07%
Operating income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.96%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-121.84%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-21.25%
Pre-tax income decline while Energy median is -20.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.85%
Pre-tax margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.78%
Tax expense reduction while Energy median is -0.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
19.72%
Net income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
12.72%
Net margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-40.00%
EPS decline while Energy median is -25.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-37.93%
Diluted EPS decline while Energy median is -24.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.05%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.