1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.64%
Growth of 10.64% versus flat Energy revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
380.05%
Cost growth of 380.05% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-69.23%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-72.19%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
7.68%
R&D change of 7.68% versus flat Energy spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
29.35%
G&A change of 29.35% versus flat Energy overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
352.36%
Marketing expense change of 352.36% versus flat Energy spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
19.94%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.48%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
10.21%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.81%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
76.51%
Interest expense change of 76.51% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
23.02%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.80%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
354.99%
EBITDA change of 354.99% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
311.22%
Margin change of 311.22% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
41.20%
Income change of 41.20% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.86%
Margin change of 46.86% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
276.34%
Other expenses change of 276.34% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
244.02%
Income change of 244.02% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
230.17%
Margin change of 230.17% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
252.20%
Tax expense change of 252.20% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-149.44%
Net income decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-144.68%
Net margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-150.00%
EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-150.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.43%
Share count reduction below 50% of Energy median of 0.03%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.