PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.21%
Revenue decline while Energy median is -3.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.40%
Cost increase while Energy shows cost reduction. Peter Lynch would examine competitive disadvantages.
-11.62%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is -1.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.43%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
21.46%
R&D change of 21.46% versus flat Energy spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-0.50%
G&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2.52%
Total costs growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
3.28%
Interest expense change of 3.28% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
18.83%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.01%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-5686.01%
EBITDA decline while Energy median is -3.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5697.79%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.04%
Operating income decline while Energy median is -5.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.32%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-271.71%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is -1.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-115.91%
Pre-tax income decline while Energy median is -11.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-116.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while Energy median is -4.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5596.81%
Tax expense growth while Energy reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-965.36%
Net income decline while Energy median is -9.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-967.18%
Net margin decline while Energy median is -6.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-920.00%
EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1125.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of Energy median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-13.07%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.