PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.60%
Revenue decline while Energy median is -12.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-19.05%
Cost reduction while Energy median is -4.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-60.64%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is -19.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-47.09%
Margin decline while Energy median is -4.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-14.37%
R&D reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-6.94%
G&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.46%
Operating expenses reduction while Energy median is -8.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-17.47%
Total costs reduction while Energy median is -6.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.12%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.46%
D&A reduction while Energy median is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-103.52%
EBITDA decline while Energy median is -21.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-104.74%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is -1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2402.01%
Operating income decline while Energy median is -34.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3194.16%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is -22.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.14%
Other expenses growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-102.52%
Pre-tax income decline while Energy median is -58.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-103.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while Energy median is -58.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.09%
Tax expense reduction while Energy median is -26.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-126.30%
Net income decline while Energy median is -59.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-135.35%
Net margin decline while Energy median is -62.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-121.25%
EPS decline while Energy median is -54.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-127.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Energy median is -56.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
10.75%
Share count change of 10.75% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
13.64%
Diluted share change of 13.64% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.