PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
12.20%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.60%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
102.35%
Growth of 102.35% versus flat Energy gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
62.68%
Margin change of 62.68% versus flat Energy margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-38.72%
R&D reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
48.07%
G&A change of 48.07% versus flat Energy overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.34%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.25%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
15.79%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.21%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
18.79%
Interest expense change of 18.79% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-78.48%
D&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-13.89%
EBITDA decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.77%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1259.49%
Income change of 1259.49% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1032.20%
Margin change of 1032.20% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
174.48%
Other expenses change of 174.48% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
194.72%
Income change of 194.72% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
136.95%
Margin change of 136.95% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-48.72%
Tax expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
824.29%
Income change of 824.29% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
643.11%
Margin change of 643.11% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
830.77%
EPS change of 830.77% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
766.67%
Diluted EPS change of 766.67% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.09%
Share count change of 0.09% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.81%
Diluted share change of 0.81% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.