PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
26.32%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.10%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-14.41%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is 1.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-27.97%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
46.53%
R&D change of 46.53% versus flat Energy spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.56%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.33%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
32.11%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 7.62%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
29.24%
Interest expense change of 29.24% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
138.43%
D&A change of 138.43% versus flat Energy D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
575.76%
EBITDA change of 575.76% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
468.74%
Margin change of 468.74% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-285.20%
Operating income decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-255.87%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
160.29%
Other expenses change of 160.29% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify control.
136.08%
Income change of 136.08% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
130.36%
Margin change of 130.36% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
565.45%
Tax expense change of 565.45% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
123.94%
Income change of 123.94% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
120.15%
Margin change of 120.15% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
124.49%
EPS change of 124.49% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
124.49%
Diluted EPS change of 124.49% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.69%
Diluted share change of 1.69% versus stable Energy. Walter Schloss would verify approach.