1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-15.27%
Negative ROE while FSLR stands at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.11%
Negative ROA while FSLR stands at 0.75%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-2.99%
Negative ROCE while FSLR is at 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
19.51%
Positive margin while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see if this confers a decisive advantage.
-4.54%
Negative operating margin while FSLR has 23.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-15.11%
Negative net margin while FSLR has 8.99%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.