1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.83%
Negative ROE while RUN stands at 9.58%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.73%
Negative ROA while RUN stands at 1.32%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.12%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
9.33%
Gross margin 50-75% of RUN's 16.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-3.77%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-8.61%
Negative net margin while RUN has 49.25%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.