PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
10.04%
Similar ROE to RUN's 9.58%. Walter Schloss would examine if both firms share comparable business models.
2.88%
ROA above 1.5x RUN's 1.32%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.
2.61%
Positive ROCE while RUN is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
21.49%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x RUN's 16.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
9.60%
Positive operating margin while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
16.49%
Net margin below 50% of RUN's 49.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or structural weaknesses.