PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-9.13%
Negative ROE while RUN stands at 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
5.50%
ROA above 1.5x RUN's 0.25%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.
1.65%
Positive ROCE while RUN is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
48.51%
Gross margin above 1.5x RUN's 19.60%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
1.26%
Positive operating margin while RUN is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
9.82%
Similar net margin to RUN's 9.92%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.