PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.00%
Negative ROE while SEDG stands at 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.32%
Negative ROA while SEDG stands at 0.49%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
1.14%
Positive ROCE while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
28.85%
Similar gross margin to SEDG's 29.31%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
1.62%
Positive operating margin while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-1.12%
Negative net margin while SEDG has 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.