PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-48.17%
Negative ROE while Solar median is -4.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate if capital structure or industry issues are at play.
32.53%
Positive ROA while Solar median is negative. Philip Fisher would see if the firm has a stronger model than peers.
-33.07%
Negative ROCE while Solar median is -5.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate whether a turnaround is viable.
46.54%
Gross margin exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if cost leadership or brand drives the difference.
-24.25%
Negative operating margin while Solar median is -19.27%. Seth Klarman would look for a path to operational turnaround.
52.99%
Positive net margin while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as an advantage over struggling peers.