PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.72
P/E less than half of CSIQ's 111.46. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
3.65
Similar P/S to CSIQ's 3.62. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.21
P/B 50-75% of CSIQ's 3.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
94.77
P/FCF of 94.77 while CSIQ has no FCF. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cash flow quality advantage.
50.10
P/OCF of 50.10 while CSIQ has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
2.21
Fair value ratio 50-75% of CSIQ's 3.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
2.57%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
1.06%
FCF yield of 1.06% while CSIQ has no FCF. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cash flow quality advantage.