PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-4.36
Negative P/E while CSIQ shows 6.50. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.95
P/S above 1.5x CSIQ's 1.45. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.54
Similar P/B to CSIQ's 1.98. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-5.32
Negative FCF while CSIQ shows P/FCF of 723.90. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-7.50
Negative operating cash flow while CSIQ shows P/OCF of 7.42. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.54
Similar fair value ratio to CSIQ's 1.98. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-5.73%
Negative earnings while CSIQ shows yield of 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-18.79%
Negative FCF while CSIQ shows yield of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.