PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-2.85
Negative P/E while CSIQ shows 60.86. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
40.27
P/S above 1.5x CSIQ's 0.57. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-1.97
Negative equity while CSIQ shows P/B of 0.35. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-59.54
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-67.22
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-1.97
Negative fair value while CSIQ shows ratio of 0.35. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-8.79%
Negative earnings while CSIQ shows yield of 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.68%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.