PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
0.70
P/E less than half of CSIQ's 5.49. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
1.48
P/S above 1.5x CSIQ's 0.49. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-1.34
Negative equity while CSIQ shows P/B of 0.26. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-5.11
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-5.13
Negative operating cash flow while CSIQ shows P/OCF of 10.79. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-1.34
Negative fair value while CSIQ shows ratio of 0.26. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
35.84%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x CSIQ's 4.55%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-19.57%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.