PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.66
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 12.97. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
2.20
P/S less than half of FSLR's 16.16. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
-1.39
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 2.07. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-33.63
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-33.63
Negative operating cash flow while FSLR shows P/OCF of 118.55. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-1.39
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 2.07. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-15.08%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.97%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.