PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
2.70
Positive P/E while FSLR shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
44.27
P/S above 1.5x FSLR's 11.65. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
-15.74
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 1.33. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-23.00
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-30.77
Negative operating cash flow while FSLR shows P/OCF of 502.16. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-15.74
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 1.33. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
9.24%
Positive earnings while FSLR shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-4.35%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.