PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-0.68
Negative P/E while FSLR shows 21.33. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
38.25
P/S 1.25-1.5x FSLR's 30.08. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
-1.48
Negative equity while FSLR shows P/B of 3.52. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-9.79
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-9.86
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-1.48
Negative fair value while FSLR shows ratio of 3.52. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-36.82%
Negative earnings while FSLR shows yield of 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-10.22%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.