PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.72
Positive P/E while RUN shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.65
P/S less than half of RUN's 28.08. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.21
Similar P/B to RUN's 2.57. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
94.77
Positive FCF while RUN shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
50.10
P/OCF 50-75% of RUN's 75.79. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
2.21
Similar fair value ratio to RUN's 2.57. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
2.57%
Positive earnings while RUN shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
1.06%
Positive FCF while RUN shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.