PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
20.49
Positive P/E while RUN shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.96
P/S less than half of RUN's 15.22. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
1.89
P/B of 1.89 while RUN has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
-35.89
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-80.98
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
1.89
Fair value ratio of 1.89 while RUN has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
1.22%
Positive earnings while RUN shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-2.79%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.