PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
32.99
P/E above 1.5x RUN's 16.95. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
8.60
Similar P/S to RUN's 9.12. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
-14.76
Negative equity while RUN shows P/B of 2.12. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-40.03
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-68.21
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-14.76
Negative fair value while RUN shows ratio of 2.12. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
0.76%
Earnings yield 50-75% of RUN's 1.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
-2.50%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.