PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
3.82
P/E 50-75% of RUN's 6.63. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
1.50
P/S 50-75% of RUN's 2.63. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
-1.40
Negative equity while RUN shows P/B of 0.51. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-47.27
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-47.27
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-1.40
Negative fair value while RUN shows ratio of 0.51. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
6.55%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x RUN's 3.77%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-2.12%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.