PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.66
Negative P/E while RUN shows 1.67. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
2.20
P/S 50-75% of RUN's 3.29. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
-1.39
Negative equity while RUN shows P/B of 0.64. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-33.63
Negative FCF while RUN shows P/FCF of 4.35. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-33.63
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
-1.39
Negative fair value while RUN shows ratio of 0.64. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-15.08%
Negative earnings while RUN shows yield of 14.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.97%
Negative FCF while RUN shows yield of 23.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.