PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.66
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
2.20
P/S of 2.20 while SEDG has no sales. Bruce Berkowitz would examine revenue quality advantage.
-1.39
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-33.63
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-33.63
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-1.39
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-15.08%
Earnings yield 7-10% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Operating Margins.
-2.97%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.