PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
43.74
Positive P/E while SEDG shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.86
P/S above 1.5x SEDG's 1.30. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.83
Positive equity while SEDG shows negative equity. John Neff would investigate balance sheet advantage.
-16.07
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-18.69
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
1.83
Positive fair value while SEDG shows negative value. John Neff would investigate valuation advantage.
0.57%
Positive earnings while SEDG shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-6.22%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.