PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-9.93
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 15.60. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.89
Similar P/S to SEDG's 7.83. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.46
P/B less than half of SEDG's 4.92. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-11.77
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 485.86. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-21.54
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 151.50. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.46
Fair value ratio less than half of SEDG's 4.92. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
-2.52%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-8.49%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.