PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-8.04
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 11.57. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.35
Similar P/S to SEDG's 6.41. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.73
P/B 50-75% of SEDG's 3.12. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-6.06
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 57.54. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-7.50
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 44.31. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.73
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SEDG's 3.12. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-3.11%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-16.51%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.