PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-13.98
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 11.34. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
3.11
P/S 50-75% of SEDG's 5.51. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.78
P/B 50-75% of SEDG's 2.58. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-11.18
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 34.45. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-17.66
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 29.06. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
1.78
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SEDG's 2.58. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.79%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-8.95%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 2.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.