PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-12.37
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 10.83. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
4.71
P/S 50-75% of SEDG's 7.27. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
3.26
Similar P/B to SEDG's 3.28. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-24.65
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 43.35. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-85.98
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 36.12. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
3.26
Similar fair value ratio to SEDG's 3.28. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-2.02%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-4.06%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.