PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.00
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 20.86. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
3.51
P/S less than half of SEDG's 8.59. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
3.89
Similar P/B to SEDG's 4.09. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-30.67
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 43.28. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
47.78
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 35.55. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
3.89
Similar fair value ratio to SEDG's 4.09. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-25.03%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-3.26%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.