PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.41
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 9.47. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.37
P/S 50-75% of SEDG's 7.31. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
-41.13
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 3.21. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-11.99
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 67.33. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-14.23
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 50.34. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-41.13
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 3.21. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-3.90%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 2.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-8.34%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.